Achtung Sie verlassen diese Länder-Website.
Falls Sie Ihren Warenkorb gefüllt haben, beachten Sie bitte, dass Sie diesen beim Wechsel in ein anderes Land verlieren. Über die Warenkorb-speichern-Funktion können Sie den Warenkorb nach Login bei Bedarf in Ihrem Account hinterlegen.
Beaker or swimming pool: Why microbes dislike big vessels
Biotechnological production processes use microbes with exceptional capabilities. Among others, they originate from soil, digestive system, plant surface or water. In the lab, the habitat of the microorganism is a stirred vessel with a volume of 0.5-20 L called bioreactor. Controlling (and monitoring) all environmental conditions in the reactor accurately transforms it into a land of milk and honey - at least for the microbes: plenty of nutrients, feel-good temperature and sufficient (breathing) air.
A first step to identify the high-performers among the microorganisms is to screen, investigate, and train them in lab-scale. This selection procedure results in first potential candidates. However, we cannot be sure that they perform adequately in a large-scale production process. To ensure their suitability, it is necessary to expand the cultivation scale – for products with huge manufacturing output (e.g. amino acids, antibiotics, or enzymes) even tremendously. Industrial bioreactors for production provide approx. 500 cubic meters of space, which is approximately a typical 25 m long swimming pool. Naively we could assume that the microbes do not care whether they live in a beaker or the swimming pool, meaning a small or big reactor. Sadly mistaken! We know from experience that for the majority of microbial production strains the up-scaling performance can be considerably different from its lab scale output – sometimes with catastrophic breakdown. This leads to enormous commercial risks during bioprocess development. How can the approximately 2-10 micrometer sized creatures notice where they are hosted? Unfortunately, the environmental conditions in the industrial bioreactor are not as constant as in the lab scale. The level of oxygen varies for different bioreactor regions and the nutrient supply is better described by “intermittent fasting at random”. Unfortunately, there is no economical technical solution to this dilemma, because mixing 500,000 liters of liquid with a stirrer is a Herculean task. Here, engineers are reaching their technical limits.
So what can be done to make process scale-up easier and more predictable and to pick the best microbes for them? The Jülich biotechnologists pursue this question and use an amazingly simple approach. The microorganisms are obviously doing far too well in a standard laboratory bioreactor. By modifying the laboratory reactors in such a way that the microbes experience the “rollercoaster” conditions of the production bioreactors here, i.e. producing inhomogeneities on a laboratory scale, we can check directly which microorganisms can cope with them. The scientists call this approach scale-down simulation. Exposing the microbes to the changing conditions in short cycles is like sending them to a biotechnological training camp for microbes.
In this way the Jülich scientists have learned that the soil bacterium Corynebacterium glutamicum reacts very good-naturedly with regard to scale-up. You can even turn off breathing air for several minutes without activating the alarm systems and taking counter measures. That could be a key to success and one of the reasons why C. glutamicum is used today as an all-round talent for the worldwide production of 6 million tons of glutamate (flavor enhancer) and lysine (feed additive) every year.
By bringing the rollercoaster conditions of production reactors into the laboratory, the Jülich biotechnologists, thus, can better predict the performance of microbes under production conditions and make the development of new bioprocesses and products more predictable. Expanding the cultivation scale therefore comes as no surprise!
Ihr Ansprechpartner vor Ort