MENÚ
ES | EUR
ES | EUR
-
- Todas las centrífugas
- Centrífugas de sobremesa
- Centrífugas de suelo
- Centrífugas refrigeradas
- Microcentrífugas
- Centrífugas multiuso
- Centrífugas de alta velocidad
- Ultracentrífugas
- Concentrador
- Productos IVD
- High-Speed and Ultracentrifuge Consumables
- Tubos de centrífuga
- Placas de centrífuga
- Gestión de dispositivos
- Gestión de muestras e información
-
- Todas las pipetas, dispensadores y manipuladores automatizados de líquidos
- Pipetas mecánicas
- Pipetas electrónicas
- Pipetas multicanal
- Pipetas de desplazamiento positivo y dispensadores
- Puntas de pipeta
- Dispensadores de botella
- Controladores de pipeta
- Accesorios para dispensadores y pipetas
- Pipeteo automatizado
- Consumibles de automatización
- Accesorios de automatización
- Servicios para dispensadores y pipetas
Sorry, we couldn't find anything on our website containing your search term.
Sorry, we couldn't find anything on our website containing your search term.
Experience Wins
Exploración de las ciencias de la vida
- Vida en el laboratorio
- Off the Bench
- Ciencia inspiradora
Which is better: a doctor or artificial intelligence? A study delivers surprising results.
These days, artificial intelligence (AI) is already being utilized in multiple areas of medical diagnostics. Researchers at the University of Cambridge have asked the question: is AI superior to doctors? In their study, the language model GPT-4 by OpenAI competed against physicians from the field of ophthalmology, with the goal of assessing 87 different eye conditions. The result: AI was superior to doctors with little experience when it came to diagnostics and treatment recommendations. Only the experienced specialists were more accurate than the algorithm. According to lead author Arun Thirunavukarasu, AI could be most helpful in those areas that lack specialists; for example, to decide whether an eye problem should be treated by a family doctor or a specialist.
Leer más